Wow!
All this discussion. I never knew there was so much going on with that.
Thanks for the snippet, and the URL Poker. That's useful reading.
Here's what I think is going on, and this is based on stuff I was learning in my Marketing and Operations Management classes in Business School.
1) Altadis is the 800 lb. Gorilla, they move markets, and when they walk, the Earth trembles. They are very aggressive marketers, their hefty size gives them market muscle. Over the lst 3-4 years they have been dividing up the market into niche segments and filling each niche with the appropriate product. Best example is the cigarillo market. Up to two years ago it was very miniscule, now many of you have witnesses just how much bigger it has gotten. Interesting that Cigarillos have been very popular in Europe, S. America, and CUBA, where a market niche for them already exists.
2) Axing overlapping marquees makes a lot of sense. Why? Because as in any production, when you complete a production run, you have to retool for the next production, whether making motorcycles or setting up the leaves for the next blend in a cigar. That is down time, idle time, when the manufacturing process (i.e. torecedors) is not being efficiently utilized. I like the idea of eliminating special marquees, like figuerados (although I'd hate to see several fave's of mine go). Why? Because it'll be better to centralize all production to the site of greatest efficiency. n Just think, not 4 or 5 Cuaba sizes, but 15 or 18! No, I don't think they'll all taste like Cuaba currently does (it doesn't make sense to do that), but I bet they'll have a myriad of flavors/complexities/strengths/characters. Now that makes more sense, to have a single site specializing in "exotic shapes" but able to produce a whole myriad of flavors (now that makes more sense).
3) Part of the push for consistency and quality in a product is: repeat sales. The customers keep coming back for more. Just think of any established brand name (i.e Sony, BMW, Kleenex, Habanos S.A.) and think of what kind of image that brings.
4) It's not just profits that Altadis seeks, it's market shares. Cigars are a very competitive business and anybody who's big, and therefore has large overhead, risks losing market share to an upstart. If Altadis's profits prove too healthy, trust me, a lot of others will enter the market and pretty soon both their profits & market share will decline. So to maintain healthy growth, not only are profits important, but so is maintaining market share. One of the best ways to do that is become innovative by producing new and existing lines cheaper and more abundantly so as to keep the customer coming back -- and it looks like Altadis is doing that.
5) The overall winner: we, the consumer. While we'll lose some favorite vitolas (I suspect that those vitolas with small number of customers can be easily substituted by other vitolas), the ones remaining should be more abundant, more available, and cheaper.
6) The strategy behind buying JR Cigars I think is pure vertical integration. If you control different segments of an industry, you also gain tremendous first mover advantage. If you keep the prices low enough, you can keep the competition out.
Well, anyhow, I could keep on rambling (easy to do when it's getting late), but I guess that's my two cents worth for now. If there any econimists out there, would love your input, feedback, or even corrections to these ideas.
MoTheMan